Our sources

These are the 216 outlets and channels whose reviews count toward our scores, with what our own data says about each one. Any outlet can be wrong about a product. The point of an average is that no single one decides.

How to read the table

Outlet and our readReviewsPrintedCriticalLean
TechRadarPublication444 79%16%+2 vs other critics
Tom's GuidePublication412 77%18%+0 vs other critics
Trusted ReviewsPublication408 79%15%+3 vs other critics
Expert ReviewsPublication265 82%23%+0 vs other critics
WIREDPublication227 99%35%-6 vs other critics
Tech AdvisorPublication165 85%22%+0 vs other critics
CNETPublication155 64%11%+0 vs other critics
Android CentralPublication131 95%31%+0 vs other critics
Good HousekeepingPublication125 15%5%+1 vs other critics
Tested & Rated (GearLab)Publication121 99%55%-10 vs other critics
EngadgetPublication120 71%23%+1 vs other critics
The VergePublication106 86%34%-5 vs other critics
Tom's HardwarePublication104 78%33%-3 vs other critics
ZDNETPublication92 58%20%-2 vs other critics
Business InsiderPublication88 0%3%-1 vs other critics
CNN UnderscoredPublication88 0%27%-2 vs other critics
The IndependentPublication84 24%2%+2 vs other critics
Digital TrendsPublication79 63%19%-1 vs other critics
T3Publication74 41%7%+2 vs other critics
Windows CentralPublication69 83%12%+5 vs other critics
OutdoorGearLabPublication57 100%51%-9 vs other critics
The StrategistPublication54 0%4%+1 vs other critics
The GuardianPublication51 6%16%+0 vs other critics
Bob VilaPublication46 41%2%+2 vs other critics
NBC SelectPublication44 0%11%-0 vs other critics
ReviewedPublication44 2%14%+1 vs other critics
How-To GeekPublication44 80%27%-3 vs other critics
PCMag Middle EastPublication43 98%16%-3 vs other critics
Popular MechanicsPublication42 0%0%+2 vs other critics
Homes and GardensIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.40 58%15%+2 vs other critics
SlashGearPublication35 63%9%-0 vs other critics
PCMagPublication35 100%29%-4 vs other critics
Root NationIndependent specialistEstablished tech outlet with named authors writing first-person hands-on reviews with comparisons and caveats.34 100%0%+8 vs other critics
PCMag UKPublication34 100%21%-3 vs other critics
Popular SciencePublication33 0%0%+1 vs other critics
WareableSpecialist siteBylined editors give critical, tested wearable reviews with pros and cons and multi-month side-by-side testing.31 0%32%+0 vs other critics
What Hi-Fi?Independent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.31 77%35%-2 vs other critics
Garage Gym ReviewsPublication30 93%10%+0 vs other critics
soundguys.comIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.27 100%56%-7 vs other critics
The AmbientIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.27 78%19%+2 vs other critics
Architectural DigestPublication26 0%0%-1 vs other critics
EpicuriousPublication24 0%42%-3 vs other critics
MacworldPublication24 38%21%-0 vs other critics
Woman & HomePublication23 87%4%+5 vs other critics
Run to the FinishIndependent specialistNamed running coach reviews treadmills after long personal use, reports real issues and gives a score, though it is affiliate-supported.23 87%4%+8 vs other critics
Family HandymanPublication23 0%0%+0 vs other critics
The DisconnektIndependent specialistBylined tech journalist reviews products used at home, with star ratings and explicit pros and cons.22 100%5%+5 vs other critics
KitGuruIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.22 100%18%-0 vs other critics
BabyGearLabPublication21 100%71%-11 vs other critics
Mattress NerdIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.21 86%0%-0 vs other critics
AppleInsiderPublication20 100%5%+1 vs other critics
Bon AppétitPublication20 0%30%-1 vs other critics
Mattress ClarityIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.20 85%10%+1 vs other critics
Creative BloqPublication19 16%21%-2 vs other critics
Taste of HomeIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.19 0%11%+4 vs other critics
Gear PatrolPublication19 0%26%-2 vs other critics
Pocket TacticsSpecialist siteEstablished gaming outlet with named hardware editor, hands-on testing, cons for each pick and scored reviews.19 100%5%+3 vs other critics
9to5ToysPublication18 6%0%+2 vs other critics
PCMag AustraliaPublication17 100%6%-1 vs other critics
TweakTownSpecialist siteEstablished hardware site with bylined hands-on reviews, numeric scores, pros/cons and a published testing method.16 100%6%+8 vs other critics
CleverHikerIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.16 100%0%+8 vs other critics
Club386Specialist siteEnthusiast hardware outlet with bylined hands-on and benchmarked reviews that list clear cons and a score.14 79%7%+1 vs other critics
Sleep FoundationPublication14 57%0%+0 vs other critics
RunningShoesGuruSpecialist siteIndependent specialist with named reviewers, self-purchased products, mileage testing, numeric scores and frank negative verdicts.13 100%54%-8 vs other critics
PCWorldIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.13 31%31%-3 vs other critics
Top Ten ReviewsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.13 46%0%+4 vs other critics
SleepopolisIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.13 85%0%+5 vs other critics
Runner's WorldPublication13 0%15%+2 vs other critics
TechaerisIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.11 18%0%+3 vs other critics
PC GamerPublication11 100%27%+2 vs other critics
Trail & KaleIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.11 0%0%+2 vs other critics
RunRepeatPublication11 100%0%+4 vs other critics
Digital Camera WorldIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.11 36%0%+2 vs other critics
iMorePublication10 20%10%+2 vs other critics
Gaming TrendPublication10 90%0%+7 vs other critics
Vacuum WarsYouTube channelstandardized vacuum tests10 0%20%+1 vs other critics
XDA DevelopersPublication10 100%0%+2 vs other critics
Pack HackerPublication10 100%20%-5 vs other critics
WirecutterPublication9 0%11%+4 vs other critics
Outside OnlinePublication9 0%11%-0 vs other critics
DC RainmakerIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.9 0%33%-2 vs other critics
Laptop MagIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.9 11%22%-3 vs other critics
GadgetGuyIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.8 100%12%+5 vs other critics
GSMArenaIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.8 50%25%+1 vs other critics
IT ProIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.8 50%12%+2 vs other critics
Electric TeethIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.8 88%25%+4 vs other critics
BBC Good FoodIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.7 100%0%+1 vs other critics
NotebookcheckIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.7 29%71%-4 vs other critics
CameralabsSpecialist siteIndependent specialist reviewer (Gordon Laing) with detailed hands-on tests, measurements, a numeric rating and noted annoyances.7 0%14%+1 vs other critics
EFTMPublication7 71%0%+4 vs other critics
ShortCircuitYouTube channelLTT's hands-on gadget channel7 0%43%-5 vs other critics
Dong Knows TechSpecialist siteNamed specialist (Dong Ngo) does extended hands-on testing, gives blunt negative verdicts and numeric ratings.7 100%29%-2 vs other critics
Pro Tool ReviewsPublication7 43%0%+6 vs other critics
BarBendSpecialist siteFitness specialist outlet whose named testers describe firsthand testing, give category ratings and note drawbacks such as price and assembly.7 0%29%-2 vs other critics
Home GroundsSpecialist siteNamed lead tester (Julia Bobak) publishes hands-on coffee gear reviews with scores, explicit pros and cons, and a stated testing method.6 100%17%+1 vs other critics
CoffeenessIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.6 0%17%+3 vs other critics
ReviewedPublication6 0%17%too few to tell
Pocket-lintPublication6 100%17%+3 vs other critics
AndroidGuysIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.6 0%17%+5 vs other critics
PickrIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.6 100%0%+4 vs other critics
Marques BrownleeYouTube channellong-running hands-on tech reviewer6 0%50%-5 vs other critics
America's Test KitchenPublication6 0%33%too few to tell
House BeautifulIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.6 0%0%-1 vs other critics
Switchback TravelPublication6 100%0%+8 vs other critics
The Solar LabIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.6 0%0%-2 vs other critics
Forbes VettedPublication5 60%20%-0 vs other critics
HouseFreshIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.5 60%20%+2 vs other critics
Android PoliceIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.5 100%60%+0 vs other critics
ProjectorCentralPublication5 60%20%-2 vs other critics
MadeForMumsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.5 80%0%+6 vs other critics
Real HomesIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.5 0%0%+1 vs other critics
Men's HealthPublication5 0%0%too few to tell
Air Purifier FirstIndependent specialistBylined (Milan Antonic) air purifier reviews with own performance, smoke and noise tests, scores and stated downsides.4 100%0%too few to tell
Coffee ChroniclerIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.4 0%25%too few to tell
LivingetcPublication4 75%0%too few to tell
EurogamerSpecialist siteEstablished games outlet with bylined hands-on reviews (e.g. Switch 2) that include criticism, plus tested headset guides.4 0%0%too few to tell
CoachIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.4 25%25%too few to tell
Outdoor AdeptIndependent specialistNamed reviewers describe specific trail testing, give scores and list drawbacks such as narrow fit and heavy weight.4 100%0%too few to tell
TechliciousSpecialist siteBylined journalists describe hands-on tests (for example rice cooked in multiple cookers) and compare weaknesses, though sampled pages are old.4 0%25%too few to tell
Game RantPublication4 0%0%too few to tell
IGNPublication4 100%25%too few to tell
Six ColorsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.4 0%50%too few to tell
Linus Tech TipsYouTube channelown lab (LTT Labs) and hands-on reviews4 0%0%too few to tell
VICEPublication4 0%0%too few to tell
DC RainmakerYouTube channelin-depth wearable and fitness tech testing4 0%25%too few to tell
Better TrailIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.4 100%0%too few to tell
New York PostPublication4 25%0%too few to tell
What to ExpectPublication4 0%0%too few to tell
FstoppersIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.4 0%0%too few to tell
RedShark NewsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.4 0%25%too few to tell
PCGamesNPublication4 0%0%too few to tell
eCousticsPublication3 0%0%too few to tell
Back2GamingIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 67%0%too few to tell
DroneXLIndependent specialistDrone news outlet with bylined hands-on reviews including own durability tests and candid comparisons.3 0%0%too few to tell
Believe in the RunIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 0%0%too few to tell
Binary ForkIndependent specialistBylined editor writes long hands-on reviews with scores and candid cons, including a self-purchased unit.3 100%0%too few to tell
Hardware CanucksYouTube channelhands-on PC hardware and laptop testing3 0%33%too few to tell
The Quantified ScientistYouTube channelmeasured accuracy testing of wearables3 0%0%too few to tell
Vacuum WarsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 33%0%too few to tell
Dave2DYouTube channelhands-on laptop and gadget reviews3 0%67%too few to tell
HardwareZone SingaporeIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 0%33%too few to tell
MacRumorsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 0%0%too few to tell
The GadgeteerIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 0%33%too few to tell
GearbrainIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 33%0%too few to tell
AmazingRibs.comPublication3 67%33%too few to tell
We Are ExplorersIndependent specialistNamed author and editor, published editorial standards, described group testing and numeric scores.3 33%0%too few to tell
SectionHikerIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.3 0%0%too few to tell
The Run TestersYouTube channelrunning shoe testing by runners3 0%33%too few to tell
TFTCentralSpecialist siteLong-running monitor specialist (Simon Baker): lab measurements of response times, colour, contrast and HDR, with real criticisms.3 0%0%too few to tell
James HoffmannYouTube channelcoffee equipment testing2 0%0%too few to tell
Best ProductsPublication2 50%0%too few to tell
Breaking EightyIndependent specialistNamed reviewer Sean Ogle plays multiple rounds with each product, gives numeric ratings and comparisons including weaknesses.2 100%0%too few to tell
AdvntureIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 50%50%too few to tell
Projector ReviewsSpecialist siteBylined reviewer (Philip Boyle) describes hands-on calibration and testing and lists real cons.2 0%0%too few to tell
global.t3.comPublication2 100%0%too few to tell
TechPowerUpPublication2 50%0%too few to tell
GamesRadar+Independent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 50%0%too few to tell
IGNPublication2 100%0%too few to tell
LB Tech ReviewsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
GeekDadIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
ComputerworldIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
Chrome UnboxedIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 50%0%too few to tell
Lon.TV BlogIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
ServeTheHomeIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%50%too few to tell
9to5MacIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
road.ccIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 100%0%too few to tell
SingletracksIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
AutoGuideIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
Stacey on IoTIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%50%too few to tell
Ideal HomeIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%50%too few to tell
CatsterPublication2 100%0%too few to tell
Treeline ReviewIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
Believe in the RunYouTube channelrunning shoe and gear reviews2 0%50%too few to tell
Doctors of RunningIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 0%0%too few to tell
MakeUseOfIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.2 100%0%too few to tell
The Next WebPublication1 100%0%too few to tell
The Size 15 RunnerIndependent specialistDedicated running-shoe enthusiast site with consistent single-author voice, genuine wear-testing, and frank criticism (e.g. weight gain in the 1080 v14).1 0%0%too few to tell
BikeRadarSpecialist siteEstablished cycling publication with named testers, pros and cons, and scored product reviews.1 100%100%too few to tell
Outdoors MagicSpecialist siteNamed testers describe field testing in specific locations, with star ratings and explicit 'what we didn't like' notes.1 0%0%too few to tell
Hardware UnboxedYouTube channelbenchmark-based hardware testing1 0%0%too few to tell
Rocket Jump NinjaYouTube channelgaming mouse and peripheral testing1 0%0%too few to tell
MusicTechPublication1 100%0%too few to tell
IGN Middle EastPublication1 100%100%too few to tell
Custom PCIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 100%100%too few to tell
LinkdhomeIndependent specialistNamed reviewer with a data-driven test methodology, numeric scores and clear criticism of products.1 100%0%too few to tell
ShacknewsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 100%0%too few to tell
StereoNETIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
DXOMARKIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%100%too few to tell
PodcastageIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
PocketnowIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 100%0%too few to tell
The SSD ReviewIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
LanOC ReviewsIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
BGRIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
HDTVTestYouTube channelcalibrated TV and display testing1 0%0%too few to tell
IGNPublication1 100%0%too few to tell
Cycling WeeklyIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%100%too few to tell
Motorcycle.comIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
CoffeeGeekIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 100%0%too few to tell
WIRED (Spanish edition)Publication1 0%0%too few to tell
The Big OutsideSpecialist siteMichael Lanza's bylined gear reviews describe specific multi-night trips and weigh pros and drawbacks; established outdoor specialist.1 100%0%too few to tell
Smoked BBQ SourceSpecialist siteNamed author describes six weeks of cooking tests and gives pros and cons for each grill.1 0%0%too few to tell
Runner's World / Outside RunPublication1 0%0%too few to tell
WearTestersIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
BicyclingIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
Fit&WellIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
Women's Health UKIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
Live ScienceIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
NSMBIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
APH NetworksIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
AutoblogIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
MotorTrendPublication1 0%0%too few to tell
PC PerspectiveIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
AllureIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell
Lance HedrickYouTube channelespresso and coffee equipment reviews1 0%0%too few to tell
The eBook ReaderIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%100%too few to tell
Good e-ReaderIndependent specialistApproved by hand: named reviewers, own testing, real negative verdicts.1 0%0%too few to tell

Recently approved, reviews still being collected: androidauthority.com, backpacker.com, bestcordlessvacuumguide.com, cyclingnews.com, genuinelactation.com, hothardware.com, intheknowcycling.com, laptopmedia.com, moderncastle.com, naplab.com, outdoorlife.com, pcmonitors.info, popphoto.com, riderguide.com, soundandvision.com, thatsourdoughgal.com, theaudiophileman.com, thedrive.com, tonepublications.com, ultrabookreview.com.

What we don't count, and why

Think a source should be added or removed? Write to [email protected].