An affordable AMOLED sports watch that does the essentials well and is among the best sports watches around, missing dual-band GPS and triathlon mode.
Garmin Forerunner 165
Image: Garminrecommend
Critics’ consensus
15 professional reviewers tested the Garmin Forerunner 165, and 12 recommend it. Most praised: battery life and display. Most common complaint: battery life.
Reviewed by Coach, CleverHiker, Android Central and 12 more
The catch: There is no dual-band GPS or triathlon mode.
We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It never changes a score.
What do critics say about the Garmin Forerunner 165?
A best-selling, accurate GPS watch offering premium features without the premium price, with a vibrant display at the cost of mid-pack battery life.
Nails the balance between cost-cutting and quality, with accurate GPS and heart rate, an AMOLED screen and big savings over pricier Forerunners, unless Training Load matters.
A nearly perfect budget running watch whose AMOLED display, reliable tracking and Garmin's core features make it a great choice for all but triathletes.
A good-looking, reliable running watch with accurate core tracking and strong AMOLED battery efficiency, ideal for beginner and intermediate runners.
A solid Forerunner with lots of accurate data and good battery, whose main flaw is a painful music download process on the Music version.
A strong AMOLED multisport watch at a lower price with good battery, though it lacks dual-band GPS and Training Readiness and sits in a crowded Garmin range.
Very accurate, light and affordable, a great value GPS watch that the testers highly recommend despite weaker battery life and a smaller screen.
Detailed running statistics and fast charging, but weak navigation, off sleep data and an overall feeling that it falls short of the Coros Pace 3.
An easy-to-use, essentials-focused running watch that is great for newcomers, with solid sleep and workout tracking and a bright display.
An excellent-value running watch for beginner and intermediate runners with helpful workout suggestions and rich health data; only the large face and missing advanced running metrics hold it back.
The bright AMOLED screen and added features make this the reviewer's new pick for an entry-level running watch, with compromises such as no multiband GPS and no triathlon mode.
Essentially a cheaper clone of the Forerunner 265S that keeps nearly everything most runners need; the tradeoffs are worth the savings and it is the reviewer's entry-level Garmin pick.
After a month of use the reviewers call it one of the best fitness trackers for runners thanks to comfort, battery life and training tools, with only a learning curve in the app.
A comfortable, good-looking and accurate running watch that suits beginners and intermediates, though it costs more than rivals and locks music behind a separate edition.
Scores are converted to 0–100. "est." means the outlet gave no number, so we estimated one from its verdict and checked our estimates against ratings outlets print. How we check estimates
What critics praise most
What critics dislike most
Not sure about the Garmin Forerunner 165?
Image: Coros
Image: Apple
Image: Garmin
Image: AppleAlso reviewed, not yet scored
- Huawei Watch 5 · 3 reviews so far
Common questions
Is the Garmin Forerunner 165 worth it?
Most critics think so: 12 of 15 recommend it. There is no dual-band GPS or triathlon mode.
Do critics agree about the Garmin Forerunner 165?
Broad agreement: scores range from 70 (RunningShoesGuru) to 90 (Coach), a spread of 20 points across 15 reviews. Most reviewers land fairly close together.
What do critics dislike about the Garmin Forerunner 165?
Battery life (4 of 15 reviews), Price (4 of 15 reviews), Software (2 of 15 reviews).
What is the best alternative to the Garmin Forerunner 165?
The Coros Nomad (critic score 90), best overall.