A very well-rounded phone that makes few mistakes and offers near-flagship quality at a manageable price.
Honor 400 Pro
Image: Honorrecommend
Critics’ consensus
4 professional reviewers tested the Honor 400 Pro, and 4 recommend it. Most praised: picture quality and performance.
Reviewed by Expert Reviews, TechRadar, Trusted Reviews and 1 more
The catch: MagicOS is clunky, and the frame is plastic.
Early score: only 4 professional reviews so far. Expect it to move as more reviews come in.
We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It never changes a score.
What do critics say about the Honor 400 Pro?
An AI-heavy near-flagship at a bargain price with a bright display, solid cameras and strong battery.
An excellent phone for the most part with a sleek look, great screen and efficiency.
A capable upper mid-ranger that does nearly everything well at a reasonable price.
Scores are converted to 0–100. "est." means the outlet gave no number, so we estimated one from its verdict and checked our estimates against ratings outlets print. How we check estimates
What critics praise most
What critics dislike most
No clear pattern.
Not sure about the Honor 400 Pro?
Also reviewed, not yet scored
- Motorola Moto G Power (2026) · 3 reviews so far
- Nothing Phone (3a) · 3 reviews so far
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 · 3 reviews so far
Common questions
Is the Honor 400 Pro worth it?
Most critics think so: 4 of 4 recommend it. MagicOS is clunky, and the frame is plastic.
Do critics agree about the Honor 400 Pro?
Broad agreement: scores range from 80 (TechRadar) to 95 (Expert Reviews), a spread of 15 points across 4 reviews. Most reviewers land fairly close together.
What is the best alternative to the Honor 400 Pro?
The Oppo Find X9 Ultra (critic score 94), best overall.



