A compelling all-rounder at a friendly price with a premium feel, good cameras and long battery.
Honor 400
Image: Honorrecommend
Critics’ consensus
5 professional reviewers tested the Honor 400, and 5 recommend it. Most praised: picture quality and battery life.
Reviewed by Tech Advisor, Android Central, Trusted Reviews and 2 more
The catch: MagicOS is less polished, and there is no telephoto camera or wireless charging.
We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It never changes a score.
What do critics say about the Honor 400?
A stylish, compact mid-ranger with a big battery, strong camera and useful AI that the reviewer prefers over the Galaxy A56.
Impressive features for the low price, with a vivid display, solid performance and great cameras.
A mid-range phone with a standout display, good value and strong portrait photography.
A successful leaner, cheaper mid-ranger with an excellent display and capable 200MP camera at about 400 pounds.
Scores are converted to 0–100. "est." means the outlet gave no number, so we estimated one from its verdict and checked our estimates against ratings outlets print. How we check estimates
What critics praise most
What critics dislike most
No clear pattern.
Not sure about the Honor 400?
Also reviewed, not yet scored
- Motorola Moto G Power (2026) · 3 reviews so far
- Nothing Phone (3a) · 3 reviews so far
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 · 3 reviews so far
Common questions
Is the Honor 400 worth it?
Most critics think so: 5 of 5 recommend it. MagicOS is less polished, and there is no telephoto camera or wireless charging.
Do critics agree about the Honor 400?
Critics agree: scores range from 80 (Trusted Reviews) to 90 (Tech Advisor), a spread of 10 points across 5 reviews. Reviewers broadly agree.
What is the best alternative to the Honor 400?
The Oppo Find X9 Ultra (critic score 94), best overall.



